<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xml:lang='en' xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
  <head>
    <title>Organic means physiology not food</title>
    <meta content='text/html; charset=utf-8' http-equiv='Content-Type' />
    <link href='/style/reset.css' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' />
    <link href='/style/master.css' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' />
    <link href='/style/typography.css' rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' />
    <script src='http://where.raysend.com/public/affinity/assets/jquery-1.2.6.pack.js' type='text/javascript'></script>
    <link href='/syndication' rel='alternate' title='RSS' type='application/rss+xml' />
  </head>
  <body class=''>
    <h1>Organic means physiology not food</h1>
    <h3 class='site'>
      <a href='/'>Affinity&thinsp;<span class='amp'>&amp;</span> its residual</a>
    </h3>
    <p class='slogan'>Simia quam similis turpissima bestia nobis</p>
    <h4 class='section'>
      <a href='/record/natural'>Natural theology</a>
    </h4>
    <div class='intro'><p>Dissection will teach you what organic is—<strong>and isn&#8217;t</strong>.</p></div>
    <div class='content'>
      <p>I found a delicious vegan restaurant near the Kyoto University campus. The food I ate had been fried, so in Japan &#8216;vegan&#8217; and &#8216;organic&#8217; don&#8217;t seem to automatically equate with &#8216;healthy.&#8217; Still, I got to thinking about the label &#8216;organic,&#8217; and it really bothers me. It&#8217;s not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with avoiding food that may contain dangerous chemicals, I just don&#8217;t like how the word has become associated with a certain production method: as if you would have a health-conscious friend over for dinner who tells you, quite pointedly, &#8220;Oh, I&#8217;m sorry. I can&#8217;t eat this salad. It&#8217;s inorganic.&#8221;</p>
      
      <p>While the organic/inorganic duality may bring to mind a molecular distinction (&#8220;Oh-my, this free-range-organically-fed chicken is made out of chemicals!&#8221;), my first thought as a biologist is to the physiological meaning. We aren&#8217;t just mushy inside, but are composed out of discrete organs, each with its own ontogenetic life. These cells go this way, those cells go that way.</p>
      <div class='marginalia'>
      <a href='http://where.raysend.com/public/affinity/spermiduct02-20080329-125959.jpg'><img src='http://where.raysend.com/public/affinity/spermiduct02-20080329-130104.png' alt='Micrograph Drosophila melanogaster spermiduct' /></a>
      <p>Spermiduct of <em>Drosophila melanogaster</em>.</p>
      </div>
      <p>If you grab the genital plate of a fruit fly with a pair of tweezers and give it a good tug, the entire gut and reproductive tract comes spilling out, nice and neat; each structure a cozy compartment of function. And yet, this compartmentalization is not a <em>property, per se,</em> of living things; it is a process. Dissecting a pupa—the stage between the wormy larva and the fly-y adult—you might notice a perfectly formed head, the wings folded neatly, six (count &#8216;em) legs. But the abdomen, the gut, sloshes out: a brown mushy slurry.</p>
    </div>
    <div class='author'>MJA</div>
    <script src='http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'></script>
    <script type='text/javascript'>
      <!-- /<![CDATA[ -->
      var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-1830373-5");
      pageTracker._initData(); pageTracker._trackPageview();
      <!-- /]]> -->
    </script>
  </body>
</html>
